| Add to Google Reader or Homepage | Subscribe in NewsGator Online | Add to My AOL | Add to netvibes | Subscribe in Bloglines | Subscribe in podnova

20091122

Books


The one thing with which all 100 Thingers seem to have trouble is books.

They are so wonderful and full of information, and there are so very, very many of them - not just in the world, but in my house, and in the houses of nearly all those who wax philosophic and who eventually come to voluntary simplicity as a result.

So, what to do?

Some count 'BOOKS' (no matter how numerous) as one 'thing' - while still others simply refuse to acknowledge the 'thinginess' of books at all. I assume, because books are meant to possess some special powers which preclude them from the necessary accounting of our considered lives. As such, we allow ourselves to be somewhat excessive under this false cover of presumed exemption. This mistake, I feel, is a mistake of quantity over quality, as are many of our habits.

I, however, have chosen to count each and every book as what it ultimately is - a thing. My hope is that through this rigorousness, I will shave down my collection to something truly essential - something which possesses superior quality to my current collection. How many that will be, I cannot say. The numbers now, are too many to guess. All that is certain for today is that one particular book will NOT be in that final, essential collection.

I have taken the step of creating a seller's account over at Amazon, and I will list those books which have sufficient market value to warrant the typing. The others will go away in other ways.

For now, I give you Metaphysics in Modern Times: A Present-Day Perspective by D.W. Gotshalk, 1940. Check it out. Buy it if you like. Comment below.

What makes your essential list?

Subscribe in a reader

20091117

The Hunter-Gatherer Cure for Depression


Human bodies have not evolved fast enough to adapt to the demands of modern life. So believes psychologist Stephen Ilardi, PhD, author of The Depression Cure and associate professor of clinical psychology at the University of Kansas. Although we’re living longer and theoretically have better health care, the risk for serious depression has been increasing for more than a century. The disorder now afflicts one-quarter of Americans (a trend mirrored across most of the developed world), and has more than doubled over the past decade alone.

Dr. Ilardi told me that he has long puzzled over the epidemic of depressive illness, which continues to worsen despite the widespread use of antidepressant medications. In fact, the risk for depression is high throughout the industrialized and modernized world, but low among traditional and aboriginal cultures. Interestingly, modern-day aboriginal peoples enjoy dramatically lower rates of many forms of illness that commonly afflict Westerners -- heart disease, diabetes, asthma, obesity and allergies among them. Dr. Ilardi believes that we should add depression to the list of "diseases of modernity."

Our Hunter-Gatherer Ancestors

Until about 10,000 years ago, all humans were hunter-gatherers, living a lifestyle we know much about from the study of contemporary foraging groups. Dr. Ilardi’s "aha" moment came while reading the work of anthropologist Edward Schieffelin, PhD, who studied the Kaluli, an aboriginal group living in the highlands of Papua New Guinea. Although the Kaluli have a low life expectancy, high infant mortality and considerable intergroup violence, Dr. Schieffelin found that they suffer virtually no clinical depression. As Dr. Ilardi struggled to make sense of this surprising finding, he stumbled upon an important insight: the hunter-gatherer lifestyle features several elements -- ranging from abundant physical activity to sunlight exposure to omega-3 consumption -- that modern science has shown to be powerfully effective in fighting depression.

Maybe, thought Dr. Ilardi, the human species never evolved "antidepressive genes" because our bodies and brains simply weren’t designed for modern life -- and our brains were protected for hundreds of thousands of years by the numerous antidepressant elements of hunter-gatherer life. As an example, Dr. Ilardi cites the fact that many of the compounds we need for survival aren’t made by our bodies -- we haven’t evolved the ability to manufacture them, he says, because we’ve always been able to get them directly from our diets. Similarly, he theorizes that the human brain has no ability to stave off depression because until 10,000 years ago -- the blink of an eye in evolutionary terms -- all people lived an "antidepressant lifestyle." Dr. Ilardi has spent the last four years developing and researching a treatment program for depression, Therapeutic Lifestyle Change (TLC), involving six curative lifestyle elements from the past that he asks his patients to weave back into the fabric of modern life. The program is described in depth in his recently published book, The Depression Cure.

The Six Elements of an Antidepression Lifestyle

1. Consume abundant omega-3 fatty acids. Hunter-gatherers ate a much more balanced diet than we do today, one rich in omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids in a ratio of about 1:1. Over the past century, omega-6 fats began to dominate human fat consumption (due to the use of processed seed oil and eating meat that was grain-fed), to the point where the ratio of omega-6s to omega-3s is now about 17:1. Dr. Ilardi’s advice: Since omega-3 fats have proven antidepressant properties, take a daily fish-oil supplement that provides at least 1,000 mg of EPA (the version of omega-3 with the strongest research support in fighting depression).

2. Avoid ruminating on negative thoughts. Hunter-gatherers lived in the moment -- survival depended on it. A well-researched and effective strategy for fighting depression encourages people to learn to interrupt rumination and focus instead on staying in the moment. Advice: Be continually engaged in what you are doing and monitor yourself to keep from brooding. Increase social interaction and shared activities. When you spend time alone, do things that keep your mind busy, like reading, watching television, painting, playing a musical instrument or cooking. Replace ruminative thoughts with positive ones. Write your thoughts down, and give yourself permission to walk away from them.

3. Get regular sunlight to keep your body clock in sync. Our ancestors spent much more time outdoors in the sunlight than we do. Sunlight not only resets the body clock each day -- necessary for healthy sleep and hormone regulation -- but it also enables us to manufacture vitamin D, which regulates 500 different genes expressed in the brain. Some researchers now say that most Americans are deficient in vitamin D, which is strongly anti-inflammatory... and, according to Dr. Ilardi, "a depressed brain is an inflamed brain." Advice: 10 to 15 minutes of sunlight exposure daily between 11 am and 3 pm, depending on your skin pigment and the time of year, plus take 1,000 IU (international units) to 2,000 IU of Vitamin D in winter.

4. Stimulate key brain chemicals through physical exercise. Hunter-gatherers probably were physically active for three to four hours each day. That may be unrealistic today, but Dr. Ilardi says that it doesn’t take that much exercise to fight depression. Research at Duke University found, for instance, that 30 minutes of brisk walking three times per week was as effective at alleviating depression symptoms as the antidepressant Zoloft after four months, and considerably more effective at a follow-up six months later. By increasing dopamine and serotonin activity, exercise actually changes the brain chemistry, says Dr. Ilardi. Advice: 40 minutes of aerobic exercise three times per week, including 10 minutes to ramp up and 30 minutes of aerobic (just able to converse) activity.

5. Emphasize social connection in order to avoid the harmful effects of isolation. Hunter-gatherers didn’t spend much time alone. The typical ancient group had between 30 to 150 members, and most worked, cooked and slept together. Nowadays we are alone a lot -- in our cars, at home, etc. Advice: Experience in-person community as much as possible.

6. Increase healthier sleep for brain and body recovery. Our ancestors got about nine to 10 hours of sleep each night, but many Americans are somewhat sleep-deprived, with 30% getting under six hours according to CDC figures. One recent study from the Stanford University Sleep Lab reported that most adults feel best after eight or nine hours of sleep. Advice: Make eight hours of sleep your goal. The Depression Cure lists 10 ways to improve your sleep habits.

Dr. Ilardi is conducting random-control trial research with a group of people he describes as severely depressed and difficult to treat. To date, about one-quarter of those on a wait list and receiving traditional therapy or medication have responded favorably over a 14-week period. In Dr. Ilardi’s Therapeutic Lifestyle Change group, approximately three-quarters of the group have gotten better.

Source(s):

Stephen S. Ilardi, PhD, author of The Depression Cure, and associate professor of clinical psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.

20091109

Re: The fictional extreme-minimalist future (Unclutterer.com)

A recent article (The fictional extreme-minimalist future) over at unclutterer.com got me thinking about some of the pitfalls we face on our way to a minimalist future, and a comment I made garnered some good response, so I've decided to expand on that thought here.

The article is actually in reference to another by Bill Reagan at PopMatters.com, called Table Space: The Final Frontier. In which he suggests:
The impressive part of 2001: A Space Odyssey isn’t what they have in the future, it’s what they don’t have: clutter.
I strongly suggest you read both articles first, for context - they are well-written and get the wheels turning.


The question being asked at Unclutterer is: do you wish the extreme-minimalist future would have become a reality, or do you think these depictions went too far? Reagan suggests that no such 'extreme-minimalist future' would be possible without what are, for him, unacceptable losses in sentimentality.

I would offer that the premise upon which both perspectives seem to be based - that sentiment and materialism are inextricably linked - is flawed. Further, it is this flaw which stands between us and any successful minimalist future.

As I said at Unclutterer, the problem with sentimentality manifested in a collection of physical things is at least two-fold:

  1. It is a largely manufactured, rather than humanly innate, desire. The more vehemently we cling to this confusion, the more stuff we are likely to buy and accumulate. This is, of course, a vivid illustration of the power and broad cultural impact of marketing since the industrial revolution.
  2. In as much as sentimentality itself is natural, we have always found a way to express it. For most of human history, that way has been through a rich oral tradition and meaningful ceremony. As we lose touch with that history, we also lose a significant part of what makes us human.

As this cycle plays out, the problem becomes more dire. As we become more-and-more convinced through the effects of clever marketing that we can cherish the memories of (insert sentimental whatever here) through the purchase of a commemorative plate, coin, picture, teddy bear, whatever, we also become further dis-connected both from our ability to maintain a sense of history through story-telling and simple mindfulness, and our ability to appreciate history in that way.

A future in which physical excess has been re-considered and largely eliminated, both for sustainable and aesthetic reasons, does not have to be one without sentiment, as long as we can re-discover the art of tradition and culture building which now lies supplanted by consumerism and neurotic hording.

Think about how many things you have that were given to you by someone special, or that you purchased with someone special. Think about how tied up with material possession your personal story is. Now, imagine throwing all that stuff away. For most of us, this is a very difficult thought experiment. I contend that the difficulty we feel is something very new, in terms of human history, and that it correlates directly with the rise of industrialism, mass-production and the very capable marketing they spawned.

Let's try this experiment instead: assuming that most readers are well in to adulthood, think back and try to remember all the stuff your grandparents bought for you as a child. Difficult? Now try to remember a story one of them told you, or a story you often tell about an experience you had with one or both of them. I suspect the list of stuff is short and difficult to appreciate. And, I suspect the list of real history, even if it is also short, is much easier to cherish and much more difficult to forget. Think about the way you feel as you remember those stories.

I contend the ease with which we remember and appreciate such oral tradition is natural and to be expected, as it is the way we have been doing sentiment for a very long time.

The problem with our current trend toward material history is that we are forgetting how to do it the old-fashioned way. We are becoming dependent on the physical, and so getting further and further behind, in terms of manifesting a clutter-free future. This dependency is what makes us so hesitant to throw away all the stuff - if we did, our fear is that we would have nothing left of whatever history that stuff represents.

Many of us no longer know how to have a meaningful conversation. Many of us no longer have the time to sit down to a lazy afternoon of story-telling with an old person. Many of us no longer know how to be together and show each other love without some physical gift.

These are all the tools of a non-material culture. Unfortunately, they are going the way of so many other 'primitive' skills. However, while matches and lighters may be superior to a couple sticks, stuff is not an acceptable alternative to oral history and story-telling. And, we need our collective memory as much as we need fire, if we are to survive.

Subscribe in a reader

Blaklader Workwear


I know this blog is starting to look more like a catalog of cool stuff than a minimalist manifesto, BUT I've been doing a lot of reading and research trying to find really well-made products that could eventually be on my list of 100 Things. (I promise I'm not being paid to say any of this stuff).

Pants - ya gotta have 'em.

I found BlakLader, a Swedish company whose stated goal is

to manufacture products that make your work more comfortable, easier and safer. Clothing that can take a beating.
They boast of regular testing of raw materials to ensure excellent quality at all times and the best protection against wear and tear, rip and pull resistance, colorfastness and shrinkage.

Every pocket, seam, button and fabric must be a beacon of functionality.

They also offer a Lifetime warranty on the stitches. According to their website, Blaklader is the only workwear manufacturer that offers a lifetime warranty on its seams. If a seam splits, as long as it has not been torn by sharp edges or tools, they'll repair or replace the garment.

So, the question is: has anybody tried these? I may go grab a pair - I found a distributor about 20 miles away. If they really last 'forever' I could ditch quite a few pairs of jeans to make room - stay tuned.

Subscribe in a reader

 
18,263 Days Later by Bill Barry. - stat counter Powered by web analytics software.